<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controversy swirls over $250 million Wisconsin biomass power project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://biomassdigest.net/blog/index.php/2010/01/28/controversy-swirls-over-250-million-wisconsin-biomass-power-project/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://biomassdigest.net/blog/2010/01/28/controversy-swirls-over-250-million-wisconsin-biomass-power-project/</link>
	<description>Biomass news for power, feed and food production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jaime P. Imbat</title>
		<link>http://biomassdigest.net/blog/2010/01/28/controversy-swirls-over-250-million-wisconsin-biomass-power-project/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaime P. Imbat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://biomassdigest.net/blog/2010/01/28/controversy-swirls-over-250-million-wisconsin-biomass-power-project/#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Coal fired power plant can be coverted into biomass base fuel with-out re-engineering plant facilities.May be there will be controversy on the 250 million dollars for what purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal fired power plant can be coverted into biomass base fuel with-out re-engineering plant facilities.May be there will be controversy on the 250 million dollars for what purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

